The Null “NoGo = Go” effect regions revealed by Bayesian analysis (Binary mask)

Contributed by Masharipov on Oct. 24, 2019

Collection: Non-selective response inhibition during an equal probability Go/NoGo task: Bayesian analysis of fMRI data

Description: The second level of analysis was conducted using Bayesian statistics in SPM12 (Friston, 2002, Friston & Penny, 2003, Neumann & Lohmann, 2003). The beta-coefficients were converted into percent signal change (PSC) following the procedure recommended by (Pernet, 2014). Linear contrasts were used to calculate the difference of the BOLD-signal percent changes in the conditions under study: 1) [“A-P NoGo” – “A-A Go”] (Experiment #1); 2) [“A-A NoGo” – “A-P Go”] (Experiment #2). If the contrast value falls within the interval [-γ; γ] with a posterior probability of over α = 95%, then the hypothesis of null “NoGo = Go” effect can be accepted, supporting similarity or the practical equivalence (more precise statistical term (Kruschke & Liddell, 2015)) of the BOLD signal between compared conditions. Applying such a threshold corresponds to a false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons (Genovese et al., 2002, Friston & Penny, 2003). The effect size threshold γ = 0.1% was used in this study that is a minimal BOLD-signal percent change that represents an “activation” (or “deactivation) in the sense of a hemodynamic response that is typically evoked in an fMRI-experiment (Friston et al., 2002). The interval [-γ; γ] can be thought as the neuronal ‘‘background noise level’’ (Eickhoff et al., 2008) or as a region of practical equivalence that expresses which the contrast values are equivalent to the null value for current practical purposes (Kruschke & Liddell, 2015). Thresholded images were binarized and multiplied (logical AND) between experiment sessions to attain conjunction maps of “NoGo = Go” effects common for both experimental sessions (Nichols et al., 2005).

Tags: inhibitory control equal probability practical equivalence action restraint no-go go/nogo meta-analysis response inhibition bayesian inference

Task View 3D View
Metadata
Field Value
Citation guidelines

If you use these data please include the following persistent identifier in the text of your manuscript:

https://identifiers.org/neurovault.image:304315

This will help to track the use of this data in the literature.