Multiple roles for executive control in belief–desire reasoning: Distinct neural networks are recruited for self perspective inhibition and complexity of reasoning

Description: Belief–desire reasoning is a core component of ‘Theory of Mind’ (ToM), which can be used to explain and predict the behaviour of agents. Neuroimaging studies reliably identify a network of brain regions comprising a ‘standard’ network for ToM, including temporoparietal junction and medial prefrontal cortex. Whilst considerable experimental evidence suggests that executive control (EC) may support a functioning ToM, co-ordination of neural systems for ToM and EC is poorly understood. We report here use of a novel task in which psychologically relevant ToM parameters (true versus false belief; approach versus avoidance desire) were manipulated orthogonally. The valence of these parameters not only modulated brain activity in the ‘standard’ ToM network but also in EC regions. Varying the valence of both beliefs and desires recruits anterior cingulate cortex, suggesting a shared inhibitory component associated with negatively valenced mental state concepts. Varying the valence of beliefs additionally draws on ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, reflecting the need to inhibit self perspective. These data provide the first evidence that separate functional and neural systems for EC may be recruited in the service of different aspects of ToM.

Related article: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.012

View ID Name Type
Field Value
Compact Identifierhttps://identifiers.org/neurovault.collection:1377
Add DateMay 17, 2016, 12:33 p.m.
Uploaded bycehartwright
Contributors
Related article DOI10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.012
Related article authorsCharlotte E. Hartwright, Ian A. Apperly and Peter C. Hansen
Citation guidelines

If you use the data from this collection please include the following persistent identifier in the text of your manuscript:

https://identifiers.org/neurovault.collection:1377

This will help to track the use of this data in the literature. In addition, consider also citing the paper related to this collection.