Found 9 images.
| ID | Name | Collection(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 550241 | Action | Biased credit assignment in motivational learning biases arises through prefrontal influences on striatal learning | Go actions (irrespective of left vs. right) compared to baseline at the time of response. This is GLM2. The GLM contains the following 13 regressors: 1-8) 8 regressors crossing the performed action (Go/ NoGo) with the obtained outcome (reward/ no reward = neutral/ no punishment = neutral/ punishment). At the time of outcomes. 9) Left hand response. At the time of responses. 10) Right hand response. At the time of responses. 11) Incorrect response. At the time of responses. 12) Outcome Onset (any outcome). At the time of outcomes. 13) Invalid outcomes (non-instructed key pressed, returning error message). At the time of outcomes. This contrast is based on the left hand response and the right hand response regressors (at the time of responses), taking the sum of both. |
| 550207 | Action | Striatal BOLD and midfrontal theta power express motivation for action | Go trials (Go action performed, irrespective of left vs. right) minus NoGo trials (no action performed). Contrasted at the time people see the cue that requires the action (deadline 1.3 seconds). Too late response are registered as NoGos. Motivational Go/NoGo task (Swart et al., 2017; 2018; van Nuland et al., 2020). Note that this Go/NoGo task is equiprobable (percent Go/NoGo trials is 50:50) and thus does NOT elicit strong inhibition-related activation. |
| 550242 | Action Memory | Biased credit assignment in motivational learning biases arises through prefrontal influences on striatal learning | Go actions (irrespective of left vs. right) minus Go actions at the time people receive an outcome. This is GLM2. The GLM contains the following 13 regressors: 1-8) 8 regressors crossing the performed action (Go/ NoGo) with the obtained outcome (reward/ no reward = neutral/ no punishment = neutral/ punishment). At the time of outcomes. 9) Left hand response. At the time of responses. 10) Right hand response. At the time of responses. 11) Incorrect response. At the time of responses. 12) Outcome Onset (any outcome). At the time of outcomes. 13) Invalid outcomes (non-instructed key pressed, returning error message). At the time of outcomes. This contrast is based on the first 8 regressors, taking all 4 Go regressors minus all 4 NoGo regressors (note that all regressors at the times of outcomes). Motivational Go/NoGo task (Swart et al., 2017; 2018; van Nuland et al., 2020). |
| 550211 | Midfrontal theta oscillations | Striatal BOLD and midfrontal theta power express motivation for action | Parametric regressor: trial-by-trial midfrontal (mean of channels FCz, Cz) theta oscillations (-250 - 250 ms relative to response, 4 - 8 Hz) measured using scalp EEG. This theta response is significantly higher for (correct) Go actions than (correct) NoGo actions. Motivational Go/NoGo task (Swart et al., 2017; 2018; van Nuland et al., 2020). Note that this Go/NoGo task is equiprobable (percent Go/NoGo trials is 50:50) and thus does NOT elicit strong inhibition-related activation. |
| 19157 | hand > foot button press | Predicting local striatal reward signals from corticostriatal connectivity | |
| 12026 | Figure 3 - Anterior > posterior connectivity | Is There "One" DLPFC in Cognitive Action Control? Evidence for Heterogeneity From Co-Activation-Based Parcellation | Regions showing significantly stronger task-dependent and task-independent connectivity of the anterior versus posterior cluster |
| 12027 | Figure 4 - Posterior > anterior connectivity | Is There "One" DLPFC in Cognitive Action Control? Evidence for Heterogeneity From Co-Activation-Based Parcellation | Regions showing significantly stronger task-dependent and task-independent connectivity of the posterior versus anterior cluster |
| 12028 | Figure 2 - Anterior cluster | Is There "One" DLPFC in Cognitive Action Control? Evidence for Heterogeneity From Co-Activation-Based Parcellation | Connectivity-based parcellation (CBP) results -- Cluster #2 (anterior) |
| 12029 | Figure 1 - Posterior cluster | Is There "One" DLPFC in Cognitive Action Control? Evidence for Heterogeneity From Co-Activation-Based Parcellation | Connectivity-based parcellation (CBP) results -- Cluster #1 (posterior) |